## 1. Where’s the Beef?

In a way, the worst flaw a data analysis can have is no analysis at all. Instead, you get data lists, sorts and queries, and maybe some simple descriptive statistics but nothing that addresses objectives, answers questions, or tells a story. If that’s all you want, that’s fine. But a data report is not a data analysis. Reports provide information; analyses provide knowledge. It’s like with your bank account. Sometimes you just want a quick report of your balance. That information has to be readily available whenever you might need it and both you and the bank have to be working with exactly the same data. If you want to assess patterns in your spending, though, you have to conduct an analysis. Say you want to figure out how much more you’re spending on commuting over the past five years, you’ll have to compile the data and scrub out anomalies, like the cross-country driving you did on vacation, to look for patterns. Analyses involve much more than a glance (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/the-five-pursuits-you-meet-in-statistics/). They take time, sometimes, a lot of time. To make sure you’re getting what you need, look beyond the data tables for models, findings, conclusions, and recommendations. If they’re not there, you didn’t get an analysis.

## 2. Phantom Populations

If there were to be a fatal flaw in an analysis, it would probably involve how well the samples represent the population. Sometimes data analysts don’t give enough thought to the populations they want to analyze. They use observations to make inferences to a population that doesn’t exist. Populations must be based on some identifiable commonalities that would meaningfully affect some characteristic. A group of anomalies would not be a population. Opinion polls sometimes suffer from phantom populations. Say you surveyed people wearing red shirts. Could you then generalize to everyone who wears red shirts? Canadian researchers found one such phantom population when they tried to create a control group of men who had not been exposed to pornography (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/relationships/6709646/All-men-watch-porn-scientists-find.html). Make sure the population being analyzed is more than an illusion.

## 3. Wow, Sham Samples

Sometimes the population is real and well defined, but the samples don’t represent it adequately. This is a common criticism of opinion polls, especially election polls. It was the reason cited for why exit polls during the presidential election of 2004 indicated that John Kerry won many precincts that ballot counts later awarded to George Bush. Medical and sociological studies may have sham samples because it is often difficult to select subjects to match some target demographic. Likewise, environmental studies can suffer from inconsistencies between soil types or aquifers. To identify sham samples, look for three things: (1) a clear definition of a real population, (2) a description of how samples were selected so that they represent the population, and (3) information about any changes that occurred during sampling, such as subjects being dropped or samples moved.

## 4. Enough Is Enough

The number of samples always seems to be an issue in statistical studies (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/purrfect-resolution/). For too few samples, question confidence and power; for too many samples, question meaningfulness (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/07/26/samples-and-potato-chips/). Usually analysts are ready for this question but beware if they cite the old familiar fable about using 30 samples (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/07/11/30-samples-standard-suggestion-or-superstition/). It may indicate their understanding of statistics is not as formidable as you supposed. Also, if they appear to be using a reasonable number of samples but then break out categories for further analysis, make sure each category has an appropriate number of samples for the analysis they are doing.

## 5. Indulging Variance

Most people don’t appreciate variance. They don’t even know it’s there (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/there%E2%80%99s-something-about-variance/). If their candidate for office is up by two percentage points in a poll, they figure the election is in the bag. Even professionals like scientists, engineers, and doctors don’t want to deal with it. They ignore it whenever they can and just address the average or most common case. Business people talk about variances all the time, only they mean differences rather than statistical dispersion. Baseball players thrive on variance. Where else can you have two failures out of every three chances and still be considered a star? Data analysts have to understand variance and address it at every step of a project. Look for how variance will be controlled in study plans (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/the-heart-and-soul-of-variance-control/

https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/it%E2%80%99s-all-in-the-technique/). Look for variance to be reported with results. And most importantly, look for some assessment of how uncertainty affects any decisions made from the analysis.

## 6. Madness to the Methods

NASA uses checklists to ensure that every astronaut does things correctly, completely, and consistently. Make sure the analysis you are doing or reviewing takes the same care. If there are multiple data collection points or times, be sure there is a standard protocol or script for generating the data. Be especially concerned if the data are collected over multiple years. Better and cheaper methods and equipment are continuously being developed so be sure they are compatible (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/the-measure-of-a-measure/). Be sure the data had been scrubbed adequately of errors, censored and missing data, replicates, and outliers (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/the-data-scrub-3/). Finally, be sure the data analysis method is appropriate for the numbers and natures of the variables and samples (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/08/27/the-right-tool-for-the-job/).

## 7. Torrents of Tests

If a statistical test is conducted in a study, false positives and false negatives can be controlled, or at least, evaluated. But if there are many tests, you can bet there will be false results just because of Mother Nature’s sense of humor. In groundwater testing, for example, there may be a test for every combination of well, analytes, and sampling rounds, resulting in literally hundreds of tests. There are strategies for dealing with this type of situation, such as hierarchical testing and the use of special tests (look for the term *Bonferroni*). Be careful of bad decisions based on a small proportion of the tests being (apparently) significant.

## 8. Significant Insignificance and Insignificant Significance

Here’s where you have to use your gut feel. If a test is statistically significant and you don’t believe it should be, ask about the confidence level and whether the size of the difference is meaningful. Just as correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation, significance doesn’t*
*necessarily imply meaningfulness. If something is not statistically significant and you believe it should be, ask about the power of the test and the size of the difference the test should have detected. Be sure the study looked at violations of assumptions (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/assuming-the-worst/). Also, look for what’s

*not*there. Sometimes studies do not report nonsignificant results. Such results could be exactly what you’re looking for.

## 9. Extrapolation Intoxication

Make sure the data spans the parts of the variable scales about which you want to make predictions. If a study collects test data at ambient indoor temperature, beware of predictions made under freezing conditions. Likewise, be careful of tests on rabbits that are extrapolated to humans, maps showing information beyond the limits observed, surveys of one demographic extrapolated to another, and the like. Perhaps the only example of extrapolation that is even grudgingly accepted by statisticians is time-series analysis (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/time-is-on-my-side/). You *have to* extrapolate to predict the future. The issue is how far*
*into the future is reasonable, which will depend on the degree of autocorrelation, the stability of the data, and the model.

## 10. Misdirected Models

Models are great tools for helping you understand your data (https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-zen-of-modeling/). Statistical models are based on data. Deterministic models, though, rely on theories, mainly the theories believed by the researcher using the model. But deterministic models are no better than the theories on which they are based. Misdirected models involve researchers creating models based on biased or mistaken theories, and then using the model to explain data or observed phenomena in a way that fits the researchers preconceived notions. This flaw is more common in areas that tend to be more observational than experimental.

Read more about using statistics at the Stats with Cats blog. Join other fans at the Stats with Cats Facebook group and the Stats with Cats Facebook page. Order **Stats with Cats: The Domesticated Guide to Statistics, Models, Graphs, and Other Breeds of Data Analysis**** **at Wheatmark, amazon.com, barnesandnoble.com, or other online booksellers.

“Misdirected Models” reminds me of an advanced low temperature (lacustrine pore water) geochemistry course in graduate school. The professor wave his arms wildly and throw out all kinds of assumptions. The assumptions would change everyday. When finals arrived, I think I wrote an entire blue book with caveats before generating some numbers. I really started to wonder about how geochemical field work and analysis could be done correctly, completely, and consistently. It just seemed like their were too many fudge factors involved, maybe it was just a “shaky theorem”.

That’s a great example. I was thinking of a lot of the economic models and even models in medicine and pharma, that try to make the data fit the model instead of deriving the model from the data. It happens in all disciplines.

Pingback: The SAS Dummy - A SAS blog for the rest of us.

hi I was luck to approach your theme in yahoo

your topic is splendid

I learn a lot in your subject really thank your very much

btw the theme of you site is really marvelous

where can find it

The content on this publish is really a single of the top material that I’ve ever occur across. I love your article, I’ll appear back to verify for new posts.

Pingback: Learn statistics with your cat | Data Mining Research - www.dataminingblog.com

Pingback: Дайджест недели, 24 декабря - сообщество программистов

Hi!

Excellent article! Can we publish it on http://www.datapult.info?

Additionally, we want to translate this article into Russian and publish on http://www.datapult.info/ru?

We insert a link to your blog as a source.

Thank you for your comment. Yes, you can publish it on your website, just be sure to provide some attribution, like a link or a citation so my publisher doesn’t get cranky. Good luck with your translation to Russian. I can only help with encouragement.

This sort of facts should be valued by everyone – it’s anything that I consider we can all draw upon. I really very much like the theme you’re applying the following which I think is wordpress isn’t it? I’ve been looking all-around for something simular but have yet to discover anything suitable for my site. I looked at the link on your footer and will try and download a copy of it for myself – thanks.

Pingback: Stats With Cats Blog: 2010 in review | Stats With Cats Blog

lol a couple of the comments bloggers write are just silly and unrelated, sometimes i wonder whether they at all read the post before writing or whether they merely look at the subject of the post and write the very first thought that comes to their minds. But it is nice to find a fresh commentary every now and then in contrast to the exact same, traditional blog garbage which I oftentimes notice on the blogs. Cheers

Good article. I am going to need some time to examine your story..

Hi, I was just surfing the web and I found your page from another site. I read some of your posts and thought they were well written. Thanks, I will try to visit your webpage again soon.

Hi there, please tell us when we will see a follow up!

I post a blog every week at https://statswithcats.wordpress.com/. The next blog will be “Grasping at Flaws,” which is the chapter of

in which “Ten fatal Flaws in Data Analysis” appears. “Grasping at Flaws” is about how to critique a statistical report even if you know little or nothing about statistics.Stats with CatsId love to catch up with you! Will contact you offline.

Nice post. I be taught one thing more challenging on different blogs everyday. It is going to all the time be stimulating to learn content from other writers and apply a little bit something from their store. I?d desire to make use of some with the content material on my weblog whether you don?t mind. Natually I?ll provide you with a link on your net blog. Thanks for sharing.

Yes, just link back to the

blog.Stats with CatsGreat blog, not later than fellow that wrote so often. The power thing that writes to-date knowledge 🙂

Very useful post. Thank You for taking the time to share it with us.

Amazing job:) I will require some time to think about the story:D

I think this blog is swell.

Highly gripping blog blurb.

How does one find out how to become a blogger, or how much a blogger makes?

Just do it. Go to wordpress.com or blogger.com and set up a blog site. It’s free. Then publicize your blogs on sites like reddit and digg. Develop a big enough following and you may attract advertizers. But like any form of writing, most people do it because they like to write not as a way to make money.

Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis | Stats With Cats Blog Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!

Excellent post at Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis | Stats With Cats Blog. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely useful info specially the last part 🙂 I care for such info a lot. I was looking for this particular information for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

Have been looking at this site for some time now…Keep up the good work . Got to know things that i did not before. Cheers!

Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis | Stats With Cats Blog Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I’ve truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

Great post at Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis | Stats With Cats Blog. I was checking constantly this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info particularly the last part 🙂 I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this particular information for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.

Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis | Stats With Cats Blog Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

Pingback: The Best Super Power of All | Stats With Cats Blog

Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis | Stats With Cats Blog Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I’ve truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

Pingback: HOW TO WRITE DATA ANALYSIS REPORTS. LESSON 1—KNOW YOUR CONTENT. | Stats With Cats Blog

Pingback: Why You Don’t Always Get the Correlation You Expect | Stats With Cats Blog

Pingback: Ten Ways Statistical Models Can Break Your Heart | Stats With Cats Blog

Pingback: How to Write Data Analysis Reports in Six Easy Lessons | Stats With Cats Blog

Pingback: Searching for Answers | Stats With Cats Blog

Pingback: Dare to Compare – Part 2 | Stats With Cats Blog

Pingback: “Ten Fatal Flaws in Data Analysis” (Charlie Kufs) | Hypergeometric